Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +7551%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Apr 2019
NVS
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU117
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy