Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (18W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +1428%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2009
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GT200B
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy