Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +6653%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2013
NVS
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GK104
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy