Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270X +6792%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
168.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Curacao
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy