Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +21956%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Unknown
NVS
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy