Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon X1550 AGP

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs ATI Radeon X1550 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1550 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.64GB/s vs 5.280GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 27W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
330 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
5.280GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV505
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
27W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy