Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310 +138%
0.1 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV610
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy