Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (20W vs 45W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT +92%
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
48
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV630
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy