Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +7503%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2021
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
36
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
TU106
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy