Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FireMV 2260

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310 +150%
0.1 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
NVS
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV620
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy