CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
VS
NVIDIA NVS 310
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+6591%
6.691 TFLOPS
NVS 310
VS
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2015
NVS
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
104.5 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
209.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.691 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
209.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF119
GPU Name
GM200
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
GM200-400-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Board Design
20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI Radeon X1550
2
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 480
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
5
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
6
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
7
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 310
8
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
9
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
10
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy