Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +6674%
6.774 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
NVS
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1042 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
18
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.04 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.774 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.774 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GA107
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
GA107-325-K2-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy