Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +2281%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2020
NVS
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
DG1
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
79 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy