Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +5628%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy