Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +3996%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy