Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +2606%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
6
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GA107
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy