Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 +377%
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GT200
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy