Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT +376%
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
R600
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy