Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +706%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
48
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Oland
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy