Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +5532%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
48
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
290W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy