Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 115W)
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +9912%
15.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
36
48
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD106
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy