Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +3739%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jan 2020
NVS
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GV100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy