Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +1542%
5.027 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
NVS 510
5
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +2440%
127
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Oct 2019
NVS
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
192
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU116
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy