Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +94%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy