Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER +2861%
9.062 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jul 2019
NVS
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy