Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +6432%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Navi 33
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy