Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +307%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Lexa
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy