Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +784%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy