Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +924%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF117
GPU Name
TU117
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy