NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+1608%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
TU116
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
