Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 68W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Oct 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
-
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Maxwell
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy