Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA NVS 810
VS
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
NVIDIA NVS 810
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Dec 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
-
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

68W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Maxwell
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy