Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA P102 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +5628%
10.77 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
-
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
25
SM Count
9
3200
Shading Units
72
200
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
0 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GT215
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy