Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (2320MHz vs 1683MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 440.3GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +65%
17.82 TFLOPS
Blender
P102 100
859
Radeon Pro W6800 +130%
1980
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
3840
200
TMUs
240
80
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
0 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Navi 21
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy