Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1683MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +468%
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1024
200
TMUs
64
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy