Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1683MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +162%
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
2048
200
TMUs
128
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy