Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 10GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +104%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jul 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
2816
200
TMUs
176
80
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Hawaii
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy