Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +1557%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
512
200
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy