Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

NVIDIA P102 101 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2505MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.3GB/s)
14976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +751%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Dec 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
25
SM Count
142
3200
Shading Units
18176
200
TMUs
568
80
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
AD102
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy