Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 101 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.3GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 101 +5%
8.617 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

107.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
269.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
134.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
8.617 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
269.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Fiji
GP104-101-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy