Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1531MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +44%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy