Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +37%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy