Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA P106 090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1665MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +26%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy