Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1531MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090 +191%
2.352 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Oct 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Oland
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy