Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA P106 090 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1531MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090 +147%
2.352 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Dec 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy