Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA P106 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 100
4.375 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +87%
8.192 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
P106 100
4070
Radeon R9 Nano +13%
4607
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1280
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Fiji
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy