Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P106M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106M +20%
2.974 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Apr 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
TU117
GP106-505-KC-A1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy