Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P106M and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +54%
4.608 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Jul 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
757 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA107
GP106-505-KC-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy