Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA P106M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P106M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +271%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Jun 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1152
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Vega 10
GP106-505-KC-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy