Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA P106M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P106M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +315%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
24
1152
Shading Units
3072
72
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
AD107
GP106-505-KC-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy